How Do We Regulate Research That Could Be Used for Evil?
IN BRIEF Prior administrations have limited the scope of some scientific research on moral or ethical grounds. Deciding to block research is about more than simply asking if a development could be used for good or for evil. Scientific research can change our lives for the better, but it also presents risks – either through deliberate misuse or accident. Think about studying deadly pathogens; that’s how we can learn how to successfully ward them off, but it can be a safety issue too, as when CDC workers were exposed to anthrax in 2014 after an incomplete laboratory procedure left spores of the bacterium alive. CLICK TO VIEW COMPLETE INFOGRAPHIC For the last decade, scholars, scientists, and government officials have worked to figure out regulations that would maximize the benefits of the life sciences while avoiding unnecessary risks. “Dual-use research” that has the capacity to be used to help or harm humanity is a big part of that debate. As a reflection of how pressing this que